London police move to limit Downing Street parties report

LONDON, Jan 28 (Reuters) – An inquiry into COVID-19 lockdown-breaking gatherings in Downing Street that might determine the future of British Prime Minister Boris Johnson could be further delayed after the police asked for the report to make only “minimal reference” to those events.

Johnson, facing the gravest threat to his premiership over the alleged lockdown-busting parties at his residence and office at Number 10, has so far weathered growing calls to resign over the events, asking for lawmakers to wait for the report.

Led by senior civil servant Sue Gray, it is looking into several allegations that staff, and Johnson, attended parties in Downing Street in breach of the rules they had themselves imposed on the population to fight the coronavirus pandemic.

It had been expected to be released this week but that time scale was derailed when on Tuesday, London’s Metropolitan Police said they had opened an investigation into some of the events to assess whether criminal offences had been committed. read more

The force has itself faced criticism for initially declining to investigate the allegations.

Officials are working on ways to publish Gray’s report without compromising the criminal investigation, and some lawmakers fear that it will be watered down.

It could, some lawmakers say, also be delayed.

“For the events the Met is investigating, we asked for minimal reference to be made in the Cabinet Office report,” the police said in a statement, referring to the department which supports the prime minister and helps implement his policies.

“The Met did not ask for any limitations on other events in the report, or for the report to be delayed, but we have had ongoing contact with the Cabinet Office, including on the content of the report, to avoid any prejudice to our investigation,” it said.

When questioned about the statement, a spokesman for Johnson repeatedly said the investigation’s terms of reference stated that Gray and her team would keep in contact with the police.

“Again it’s an independent investigation, we haven’t been privy to the details of that investigation or any of its content,” he told reporters.


Gray’s report, which she will deliver to Johnson before it is published and presented to parliament, is seen as crucial to his fate, and he and his ministers have said people should not reach any conclusions before its release. read more

She is looking into what has become weeks of a steady drip of stories about events in Downing Street, with reports of aides stuffing a suitcase full of supermarket alcohol, breaking a children’s swing and dancing until the early hours.

Johnson’s spokesman has said the prime minister does not believe he broke the law and that Downing Street wants the report to be published as soon as possible.

But officials say the police investigation has complicated the report’s publication because they have to determine what can be left in it and what elements need to be removed. The risk, lawmakers say, is that the most damaging conclusions could be removed.

“From the Met statement, it’s clear that the most serious allegations will not be available for parliament to view and could possibly delay the report further,” said Andrew Bridgen, a Conservative lawmaker who has called for Johnson to resign.

“This does nothing to diminish my view that the prime minister’s position is untenable,” he told Reuters.

Opposition politicians have also demanded that Johnson resign and accuse him of persistently lying.

The Scottish National Party’s leader in parliament, Ian Blackford, said the Gray report must be published in full without any more delay.

“People are understandably concerned that this increasingly looks like a cover-up,” he said on Twitter.

“The prime minister cannot be allowed to wriggle off the hook by using the Metropolitan Police investigation as an excuse to further delay or doctor the report.”

But the delay has given space to efforts by Johnson and his supporters to persuade colleagues not to try to trigger a confidence vote in him. Some lawmakers have said they would wait until the report before moving against him.

Reporting by James Davey, Elizabeth Piper and William James; writing by Elizabeth Piper, editing by Guy Faulconbridge, Kate Holton, Mark Heinrich and Angus MacSwan

Related Articles

Back to top button